Why it matters
Complete the action to advance automatically.
Interactive introduction · About 5 minutes · No account needed
See a place.
Understand its needs.
Plan what comes next.
Follow a health-access question from neighborhood evidence to provider comparison and a documented next action.
Compare surrounding counties
Combine two measures
Select a tract or use these buttons:
Compare the sources
Inspect the candidate match
Candidate match
Example Central Clinic (registry) ↔ Example Central Health (OSM)
Similar address and nearby coordinates. Review before treating these as one site.
Unmatched listings
Each source also contains example records absent from the other. Absence is a reason to investigate, not proof that a clinic is closed.
From exploration to a work plan
Evidence and site planning
Carry your selected county, indicator and tract into candidate-site and road-access analysis.
Care directory
Compare source listings and dated reviews of access, services and capacity.
Rural planning
Organize projects, tasks, supporting evidence and funding-program research.
Health assessment
In the Thurston pilot, connect community/provider input to priorities, actions and a printable working report.
Live workspaces and permissions determine which evidence and actions are available.
Your output: evidence with a next step
Illustrative planning note · Not a real assessment
Investigate transport barriers to care
Observation: Compare the selected example tract's diabetes and vehicle-access indicators with listed services.
Still needed: Resident input, provider confirmation, transport options and an assessment of data limitations.
Possible next action: Ask the planning team to verify access barriers with community partners before proposing a site.
The live product's reports use admitted evidence and recorded inputs. This download only demonstrates a planning note; it is not a live report export.